Saturday, March 24, 2007

A Streetcar Named Desire

It was interesting to me as a reader that in A Streetcar Named Desire the author chose to pit the fleeting values of the past against the upcoming values of the future that were diametrically different. Blanche, the "southern belle" lives in that past, but is crushed by it as well. We see it come up again and again as struggles with her drinking , saying she rarely touches it, but Stanley feeling that he has to dominate her and shatter this pretty idyllic world that she has created, tells her that "Some people rarely touch it, but it touches them often." {page 639} In her struggle with her relationships with men we see Blanche search for that perfect match, someone to care for her, much like Janie in Their Eyes Were Watching God , but Blanche, unlike Janie always self destructs. She can't quite attain the dream, so she settles for fulfilling her sexual needs, but hiding it, creating this idealistic world because women did not flaunt their sexuality. Stanley who discovers this uses Blanche's own past against her in the only way he can, taking that which a true southern belle holds to be her greatest gift. {Page 684} Even Mitch discovers Blanche's many lies and decides that she is not clean enough, that she does not possess the "womanly values" to be around him and his mother and is on the verge of sullying her already questionable reputation. {Page 680} It is a sad commentary on a life when a that's left is a path of lies and shattered dreams. Yet I see Stella as the more tragic character. She is the one who betrayed her sister in favor of her husband who beats her and will most likely beat their children. Stella is the one who left Belle Reve behind so it could fall. Stella is the one who choose to follow the new world values and leave behind everything. I find it ironic that in the end it is Stella who chooses of her own free will to live in this idealistic world where she has to believe lies and delude herself in order to continue to live with Stanley. It is an interesting commentary on life as we see how dependant the female characters on the men in the story. Williams as an author is portraying these gender roles so women have limited choices and we see how even Stella is locked into the past. Would we see, I wonder if Stella had chosen her sister to eventually leave Stanley, take her child and find a job, an apartment, a healthcare package and go on with life....without a man. Maybe that's the real elucidation of the story. men only complicate things and eventually make you go crazy.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

haha, Jenilyn, that closing statement was funny, " maybe thats real elucidation of the story. Men only complicate things and eventually make you go crazy." I had to laugh. I think it goes both ways though.It seems like the last 3 stories we read make men just seem like absolute dogs and women are so helpless with or without them.

Nicole said...

I really enjoyed your post. You are right, Stanley defenitley is portrayed as a "dog" in this play. The women are set up, so the audience feels sorry for them. It interesting.

Stephanie said...

Jenilyn,
You’re post was really interesting and insightful. I like how you pointed out that Stella is actually a very tragic character … I agree 100%. The lust between Stanley and Stella will only hold them together for so long; especially after having children, who, like you said, Stanley will most likely beat. Stella seems to be stuck in a rut that no one can help her out of; not even herself.